Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Unknown Archetype | elvin7 | 7-2 | None |
Orzhov Pixie | sam_lewin | 7-2 | None |
Orzhov Pixie | stickywicket | 6-2 | None |
5 Color Legends , Abzan Pixie , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Grixis Crimes , Mono Black Enchantments , Mono Black Skeletons , Orzhov Pixie , Orzhov Reanimator
Tinybones Joins Up ranks #224 out of approximately 1172 cards in raw efficiency (top 19%).
Black average: 72.6%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Tinybones Joins Up is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Performance Efficiency: 41.49 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 78.3%. Tinybones Joins Up has a win rate of 72.6%, making it 7.3% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stock Up | Sorcery | 5 | 74.4% | 1 |
Bitter Reunion | Enchantment | 5 | 72.5% | 2 |
Final Vengeance | Sorcery | 9 | 70.6% | 2 |
Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 14 | 68.5% | 4 |
Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 8 | 66.9% | 2 |
Disturbing Mirth | Enchantment | 11 | 64.8% | 2 |
The End | Instant | 9 | 63.9% | 2 |
Spiteful Hexmage | Creature — Human Warlock | 12 | 63.0% | 3 |
Shardmage's Rescue | Enchantment — Aura | 5 | 62.3% | 2 |
Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 9 | 58.9% | 3 |
Cards that perform better with Tinybones Joins Up than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 9 | 79.2% | 73.2% | +6.0% |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 9 | 78.8% | 74.6% | +4.2% |
Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 12 | 75.3% | 72.9% | +2.4% |
Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 13 | 74.0% | 71.7% | +2.4% |
Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 14 | 74.2% | 72.6% | +1.5% |
Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 10 | 72.4% | 71.2% | +1.2% |
Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 14 | 72.6% | 71.9% | +0.7% |
Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 14 | 72.6% | 72.2% | +0.4% |
Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 6 | 73.2% | 73.0% | +0.2% |
Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 4 | 5 | 73.9% | 73.8% | +0.1% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | 54 | 3.4% | 51.9% |
Orzhov Pixie | 39 | 43.8% | 49.0% |
Dimir Midrange | 21 | 1.0% | 54.6% |
Dimir Bounce | 14 | 2.8% | 40.7% |
Rakdos Sacrifice | 11 | 14.3% | 64.8% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.